Chapter 9
Money Makes Community?
©Eso
A.B.
While today the tradition of Midsummer’s Eve and Dionysian Festival—along with self-sacrifice as a communal custom—is long dead and gone, and organizers of Midsummer events have substituted the long ago community religious ritual with conventional entertainment by pop music and (at Stonhenge) with pseudo Celtic priests doing nothing, a writer’s imagination may, nevertheless, evoke the event with its religious meaning intact. Thus, the following is for the reader’s imagination, his-her own theatre in the head:
Brussels , the capital city imposed on the European Union by
European political elites, today suffers from a greater plague than Thebes ever did
yesteryear. Brussels, built over the bodies of more than ten million Africans
and over thousands of severed hands and legs of African children http://www.enotes.com/king-leopold-ii-congo-reference/king-leopold-ii-congo
, all dead or crippled at the behest of King Leopold II of Belgium, is a city
built with Money earned with more blood and pain than any other city in Europe.
The urban monster—remade in the image of a seemingly kindly uncle from the EU
and former premier of Belgium Herman van Rompuy—now proposes to compress
European nations into a federated ‘black hole’ at Brussels, which is to play
the role of a gravitational ‘attractant’ for the future of Europe. The key and
lead word here is “global governance”. http://thenewamerican.com/world-news/europe/item/14041-bild
--without ever asking the people of Europe
what they think of it.
Money Makes Community?
©
After
the lessons of the Bacchanal (the name comes from the name of the Roman God of
wine, thus perhaps meaning events at a debauch) were absorbed, the city was let
survive without the intercession of laws. The tragedy of King Pentheus’ mother
Evanka (Agave), who had cut off the head of her of son, became known far and
wide. Fiery upturned trees, symbolizing a community uprooted by a city, the
crevices between roots filled with pitch or resin, sometimes holding the head
of a he-goat (trag in greek=he-goat), rose in the sky
as flaming torches at, both, summer and winter solstices.
The
ritualistic ‘Bacchanal’ that was celebrated at the foot of the tree or pole
that held the roots came to be called a tragedy or “Theatre of ‘sacrificial
violence’” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ren%C3%A9
Girard . Many hundred years of peace followed. Playwright Euripides most
likely wrote the tragedy as a reminder what happens when the effects of reality
wear off and violence begins to reemerge.
Dionysus,
who had escaped the riot police of Thebes ,
became a theatre director and came to visit Thebes every year at Midsummer. The ritual-play
reminded everyone of the bloody event that had cost the citizens of Thebes their sanity and
King Pentheus his head and why it had happened. Cities all over the world learned
from the event.
This is
not to say that a ‘sacrificial event’ is everywhere the same. As we may
remember (see Ch. 1), Jesus the Bogomil died in Constantinople
as a result of being pushed into a roaring pit of fire. In Latvia , one of
its kings was captured by an enemy and killed by the heat of a red hot iron
crown that was put on his head. This is why the Latvians still light a ‘live’ fire
and raise it into the air on Missummer’s Eve Festival of Dionysus-Yahnyi.
Alas,
the Latvians no longer remember that the wood baskets that they raise were once
the roots of an upturned tree. Nevertheless, we may guess that the reason goes
back to Euripides’ “The Bacchae”, and the
daring and—at the horrific—ritual invented by the King’s mother to detract
everyone’s attention from her own bloody act. Indeed, her act, the invention of
the ritual in which she places her son’s head among the roots of the tree, then
raises the resin coated roots and stem, burning, into the sky as if it were the
sun, may be viewed as the first act of theatre and tragedy.
While today the tradition of Midsummer’s Eve and Dionysian Festival—along with self-sacrifice as a communal custom—is long dead and gone, and organizers of Midsummer events have substituted the long ago community religious ritual with conventional entertainment by pop music and (at Stonhenge) with pseudo Celtic priests doing nothing, a writer’s imagination may, nevertheless, evoke the event with its religious meaning intact. Thus, the following is for the reader’s imagination, his-her own theatre in the head:
Imagine
that the public brings to the Stonehenge a
tree uprooted by a storm and with its roots still intact. The roots are then
covered with tar, the tar is put to fire, and the tree is raised (upside down
and with appropriate pulleys) in the air. After the roots have burnt and the
fire has exhausted itself, the trunk of the tree is lowered; the burnt end of
the stump is severed from the trunk and carried to a place of honor, where it
stands until the arrival of the winter solstice.
Sadly,
no one in Europe remembers today remembers that to keep the community strong,
the head of the community once had to sacrifice his-her head to prove his-her
right to have been its leader.
Today
the pseudo heads of European governments receive upon retirement a political
promotion to a backbench EU office in Brussels ,
or a chair on the advisory committee of a private company, or take a
comfortable retirement check.*
Nevertheless, in spite of the king’s
head as an object of sacrifice, nothing ‘refreshes’ for the public its sense of
awe so much as someone taking self-sacrifice for the sake of the community
seriously http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-22620143 . For all the masterful staging of the ‘reality’ of the
EU, it remains (now that the Money for the rigging is gone and unlikely to
return) an unconvincing spectacle https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TcR1cG_LZSQ.
Without necessarily agreeing with
England’s PM Cameron on all his arguments (at above link), I agree on his basic
principle, i.e. no lesser sovereignty any European country than England, no
lesser choice to determine its national life and culture, an in and out choice with regard to the union, and so on.
Unfortunately, self-sacrifice has
been removed as an agent of good government ever since the Superego of God has
been replaced by the Superego of Money. This phenomenon (of Money determining
the kind of government rules over a people) has only recently begun to return
the swing of the scales toward a balance, which, hopefully, will bring our
planet out of the danger zone.
Our planet lies in tatters as the
living land is turned into a desert; as arguments for increased energy supplies
dismiss the tattered nature of the planet as irrelevant to its survival; as
city life continues to be praised even as the city increasingly resembles the
environment of a desert; and as the trillions in dollars that have been
borrowed against the future are already causing innumerable deaths among adults
and children of the population at large; and as the community of humans has
been shattered by the Superego of Money for well over a century already.
In a
matter of only a few centuries (predominantly the 19th & 20th)
attachments that held human beings together as a community were politically invalidated
and eliminated as effectively as the European Union has been hoisted on the
people of Europe. With the arrival of the 21st century so-called
‘atheism’ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gx3_2lpvZKM
, propelled by the inertia of Money (in spite of it becoming soon valueless) is
advertising itself as irresponsibly as advertising that sells ‘sterile
optimism’ in futuristic consumer items.
No comments:
Post a Comment