Chapter 15
Afterword
Eso A.B.
The slam-dunk or two against the psychologist and philosopher Slavoy ŽiŽek, that appear in these blogs, is over his failure to recognize that the greatest of problems for ‘knowledge’ in our time is not due to an inability to think, but due to the failure of the knowledgeable to recognize the most important false flag operation ever: the mistaking of neo-Christianity for the real thing. Thus, while Žižek acknowledges Christianity as “rearticulating… a series of crucial motifs and aspirations of the oppressed”*, he fails to discover in the continued existence of the neo-Christian institution the hidden (because spiritual) poison of capitalism.
*** For Žižek, the ‘anti-Semite’ stands for anti- Gypsy, Jew, Slav, Muslim, Black, etc. Žižek writes (Ibid., p 79): “[The] fundamental mechanism of self-criticism is unthinkable in fascism.” Apparently Žizek wants his readers to fail to see that he wishes to free the Bolshevik-Stalinist from the necessity of exercising such self-criticism as necessitates self-sacrifice as a Really Existing Act within a Bolshevik ruling body. I fail to see how his position differs from the Roman Catholic one, or from that of any modern government, or that his ‘writing’ fundamentally presents a story different from that of the ‘false flag’ story about world famed Jesus Christ.
**** Ibid. p. 143.
PS. Because my way of 'thinking' is like a Tibetan twirling a prayer wheel, it stops only when another prayer presents another need. Therefore, these series of blogs at “jesusthebogomil” may yet discover some continuation on another blog site, re: http://esoschronicles.blogspot.com , beginning with blog 141 ff. May we meet again there!
Afterword
The slam-dunk or two against the psychologist and philosopher Slavoy ŽiŽek, that appear in these blogs, is over his failure to recognize that the greatest of problems for ‘knowledge’ in our time is not due to an inability to think, but due to the failure of the knowledgeable to recognize the most important false flag operation ever: the mistaking of neo-Christianity for the real thing. Thus, while Žižek acknowledges Christianity as “rearticulating… a series of crucial motifs and aspirations of the oppressed”*, he fails to discover in the continued existence of the neo-Christian institution the hidden (because spiritual) poison of capitalism.
The failure to link Christianity with the rise of capitalism
irradiates every Westerner, this blogger including, with tuberculosis like
bacillus that makes one ever more tired, helpless, and brings one and the
environment in which one lives ever closer to death.
While one may ignore the history that a ‘rearticulated’ and
retold story puts on the table for reconsideration, failure to give credibility
reconsider it makes every oligarch a saint and the remnant of Earth one of the
ten legendary lepers whom only a lie can heal http://palamas.info/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Christ-and-the-healing-the-ten-lepers-32.jpg
.
I came to recognize the story of Christianity in the West
as a false flag not due to any special insight on my part, but thanks to the
same Slavoy ŽiŽek and Anatoly Fomenko, the latter of who the History Channel
seeks to discredit for implicitly turning its thoughtless versions of history
on video into serious farces. Each of the men, in their own way, has enabled my
skepticism to become ever more certain that our ‘history’ is the story of a
road to hell.
It is interesting that at a time when Stalinism is fading
from living memory, I—a victim of it—should reawaken to it. Seventy-two years after
the fact, I am forced by the turn of the screw of geopolitics to think the
matter through again. Perhaps if the mass deportation had caught up with us (if
we had lived to the collection centre), and my siblings and myself had died (our
father was not so fortunate and was killed), but the Soviet Union had survived
and not been sabotaged by the military-industrial complex of the West—perhaps
our death had not been in vain and Bolshevism and Stalinism was the antidote
needed—had Stalin not spat into the bloody stew he had cooked.
This is where Žižek’s analysis becomes important. He
writes**: “In Lacanian theory, the Real has two principal sides, One is the
Real as a remainder that is impossible to symbolize, a scrap, a refuse of the
symbolic, a hole in the Other…; the other is the Real as writing, construct,
number and matheme. These two sides perfectly correspond to the opposition
fascism/Stalinism. The hypnotic power of Fascist discourse is supported by the
‘gaze’… of the leader. The support of Stalinist discourse is, in turn, the writing.
Which writing? .… The impossible Real is the institution of the ‘classics of
Marxism-Leninism’ as the sacred Text….”
What ‘sacred text’?
My ‘complaint’ with Lenin. Stalin, and Žižek is not that
they are ready to kill me (even though, I pale before the thought), but that
they fail to make the Text ‘sacred’ by bloodying it with their blood and paling
their lives and faces before it. I say this as a ‘survivor’ both of Bolshevism
and Christianity, the latter which now brings not only the West, but the entire
planet to its knees.
We know that Lenin when paralyzed by a stroke wished to
take his life, and asked Stalin to help him, but Stalin referred the request to
the bureaucracy of the Politburo, which refused to grant permission. The
failure of Stalin and the Politburo to sacralize the Bolshevik Revolution is,
therefore, the reason the Revolution died not only for choking thought and
preventing it from coming to a conclusion, but for thoughts put to death by
lack of determination to tear the curtain and reveal the ‘False Flag’ protected
and carried by none other than the bureaucracy itself. Stalin, the individual,
failed Lenin and the Revolution by turning cowardly and replacing himself with
a bureaucracy.
As for Žižek, he manages to defend Lenin, Stalin, and
himself with the meta-thought that I should trust their judgment. To wit: “The
so-called ruling bureaucracy [of Really Existing Socialism] is not just the new
class; it comes to stand in place of the ruling class.”**
Indeed; such rubbish creates but another academic born by
means of the autosexual verbal method, being educated in a Politburo school to
become a ruling bureaucrat, and as such ‘a New Man’ given license to sign from
behind a University desk death sentences at will, and with no more
responsibility over my or your Extinction than "the Federal Republic of
Germany [which today continues to be] a neo-Nazi State, the direct heir of
Nazism..."****. Unfortunately, liberalism cannot escape being liberalism,
just because Žižek squares it or because the German
State (with American complicity)
fudges the nature of its ideology by continuing to pay the State of Israel Holocaust
reparations that serve to repress the Palestinians et al.
*
Slavoy Žižek, “The Universal Exception”, Continuum, p 81.
**
Ibid., p 85.*** For Žižek, the ‘anti-Semite’ stands for anti- Gypsy, Jew, Slav, Muslim, Black, etc. Žižek writes (Ibid., p 79): “[The] fundamental mechanism of self-criticism is unthinkable in fascism.” Apparently Žizek wants his readers to fail to see that he wishes to free the Bolshevik-Stalinist from the necessity of exercising such self-criticism as necessitates self-sacrifice as a Really Existing Act within a Bolshevik ruling body. I fail to see how his position differs from the Roman Catholic one, or from that of any modern government, or that his ‘writing’ fundamentally presents a story different from that of the ‘false flag’ story about world famed Jesus Christ.
**** Ibid. p. 143.
PS. Because my way of 'thinking' is like a Tibetan twirling a prayer wheel, it stops only when another prayer presents another need. Therefore, these series of blogs at “jesusthebogomil” may yet discover some continuation on another blog site, re: http://esoschronicles.blogspot.com , beginning with blog 141 ff. May we meet again there!